| Author |
Message |
MissKay
fashionable

Posts: 79
|
Posted:
Sat May 03, 2008 11:15 pm |
  |
Haha So kate moss is really short? |
|
|
  |
 |
Google
|
Posted:
|
 |
|
|
 |
Callie85
FMD moderator

Posts: 14046
Location: Glasgow / Scotland
|
Posted:
Sat May 03, 2008 11:19 pm |
  |
about 5 ft 6 or 7 |
_________________ "Sarah Jessica Parker is either a really ugly woman or a really beautiful seahorse" FB (LEGEND) |
|
  |
 |
BellaBeauty
trendy fan

Posts: 585
|
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:36 am |
  |
Omg, your goregeous! I love your hair lol like the colour's so vivid
Anyway yeah agreeing with the others here.... it isn't as much of a biggie you being 5'8 agencies do have a tendency to lie lol. and you'll probably grow anyway  |
|
|
  |
 |
orlaithob
observer

Posts: 24
Location: London
|
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 11:59 am |
  |
Wowee (:
Thank you for all your support! I think I still might grow a couple more inches anyway [;
xx |
_________________ Orlaith, 14, 5'8", 32:24:32 (: |
|
    |
 |
Katie033
fashionable

Posts: 53
Location: Estonia
|
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 2:15 pm |
  |
I adore your look and you have very beautiful hair.  |
|
|
  |
 |
MissKay
fashionable

Posts: 79
|
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 2:51 pm |
  |
The news pictures are really cool. You should send them to an agency.  |
|
|
  |
 |
orlaithob
observer

Posts: 24
Location: London
|
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 2:55 pm |
  |
| MissKay wrote: | The news pictures are really cool. You should send them to an agency.  |
Would they 'accept' them kind of photos? I thought that they might just sort of discard applications with photos that arent direct and clear (without makeup etc.)
I do like them photos, but they could be a bit misleading?
Thank you for commenting
xx |
_________________ Orlaith, 14, 5'8", 32:24:32 (: |
|
    |
 |
MissKay
fashionable

Posts: 79
|
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 2:58 pm |
  |
| orlaithob wrote: | | MissKay wrote: | The news pictures are really cool. You should send them to an agency.  |
Would they 'accept' them kind of photos? I thought that they might just sort of discard applications with photos that arent direct and clear (without makeup etc.)
I do like them photos, but they could be a bit misleading?
Thank you for commenting
xx |
Hum..maybe not but you should send them as extra pictures. Not like polaroids. |
|
|
  |
 |
orlaithob
observer

Posts: 24
Location: London
|
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 2:59 pm |
  |
| MissKay wrote: | | orlaithob wrote: | | MissKay wrote: | The news pictures are really cool. You should send them to an agency.  |
Would they 'accept' them kind of photos? I thought that they might just sort of discard applications with photos that arent direct and clear (without makeup etc.)
I do like them photos, but they could be a bit misleading?
Thank you for commenting
xx |
Hum..maybe not but you should send them as extra pictures. Not like polaroids. |
Oh yeah, i guess so. They could see my MANY FACES, lol x |
_________________ Orlaith, 14, 5'8", 32:24:32 (: |
|
    |
 |
MissKay
fashionable

Posts: 79
|
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 3:00 pm |
  |
| orlaithob wrote: | | MissKay wrote: | | orlaithob wrote: | | MissKay wrote: | The news pictures are really cool. You should send them to an agency.  |
Would they 'accept' them kind of photos? I thought that they might just sort of discard applications with photos that arent direct and clear (without makeup etc.)
I do like them photos, but they could be a bit misleading?
Thank you for commenting
xx |
Hum..maybe not but you should send them as extra pictures. Not like polaroids. |
Oh yeah, i guess so. They could see my MANY FACES, lol x |
Loll yeah. Some agencies ask a ' modeling portfolio'. |
|
|
  |
 |
|
|